2
o Names and passwords are going to be established for the active sites. Please review the list
of names are on the ASPIRE website under tab Performance Measures → Quality Committee
Members. If any changes need to be made, please contact Tory Lacca.
Dashboards
o All measures are represented by a performance percentage. The performance will be
highlighted in green or red, referencing the threshold number determined in previous
discussions. The institutional number is at the bottom and is unique to each institution
nobody have access to other institutional codes for other sites.
o Each measure summary has the following:
Inclusion
Exclusions
Compliance
Responsible provider
The graph to the right indicated your performance vs. all institutions and the red bar
is the threshold.
Question: Do you anticipate adding age?
o Answer: As we build out the tool, we will be adding filters and we will include
age. The filters will be on a measure-by-measure basis and will depend on the
measure.
Ranking screen include data over the last twelve months
o X-axis is the institution
o Y-axis is the compliance percentage
o The red bar is the threshold
MPOG/ASPIRE is working on determining a standardized approach to data
diagnostics to measure data quality.
o Question: Will you be categorizing institution? For example, compare a
comparing peds to peds, ambulatory centers to ambulatory centers, etc.
Answer: The measures were built so that the thresholds apply to a broad
range of institution type. We will be determining filters for institutions and
categorization.
Failure reports
Case Viewer
Notification plan
o How are you going to provide feedback to individual providers?
We will hold off on forwarding this to individual providers until we can verify the data
quality is good.
We plan to create an e-mail from Galileo that the QI Champion can forward to the
providers. We ask you to hold off on that for now, until we can get that mechanism in
place and ensure data accuracy.
Training plan
o Jaime Osborne, the ASPIRE QI Coordinator will be producing a one-page document for
training purposes. We think the tool is intuitive, but we will be making a tip-sheet for
assistance.
o Question: If we have a provider that does not do something very much, will we make a
reliability adjustment for those cases? How do we make it reliable and make it explainable?
We will come up with a way to determine this by the March Quality Committee
Meeting.
3. Review data/ measures from each institutions (from Genevieve)
Institutions who are currently providing data. See Appendix A.
4. Roll call/ Attendance/March 16, 2015 Meeting