©2014 MFMER | slide-1
J. Ross Renew MD FASA FASE
Associate Professor of Anesthesiology
Vice Chair of Research
Mayo Clinic Florida
@rossrenew
HOW TO IMPLEMENT QUANTITATIVE
NEUROMUSCULAR MONITORING
INTO YOUR PRACTICE
©2014 MFMER | slide-2
• Merck-funded research (funds to Mayo Clinic)
• Speaker for Senzime AB
Disclosures
©2014 MFMER | slide-3
To Do…
• Why should I care about monitoring?
• Recent advances in objective neuromuscular monitoring modalities
• Anesthesia 101: Monitoring Sites/ Patterns of Neurostimulation
• Practical considerations for introducing objective neuromuscular
monitors into practice
©2014 MFMER | slide-4
Consequences of Residual NMB
• Subjectively worse recovery
Murphy Anesthesiology 2011, Murphy A&A 2013, Murphy A&A 2021
• Hypoxemia
Murphy A&A 2008
• Impaired Pulmonary Function
Eikermann Chest 2005
• Upper airway obstruction
Sundman Anesthesiology 2000, Murphy A&A 2008
• Postop pneumonia
Berg Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1997
• Respiratory failure
McLean Anesthesiology 2015
https://www.istockphoto.com/photo/large-stack-of-papers-gm184881173-18349926
©2014 MFMER | slide-5
Nomenclature
• Clinical assessment = 5 –sec head lift, grip strength, etc…
• Subjective evaluation = Peripheral nerve stimulator (PNS)
• Quantitative (objective) monitoring = monitor that
stimulates a peripheral nerve, measures the response to
stimulation, and converts this signal to objective data
©2014 MFMER | slide-6
©2014 MFMER | slide-7
©2014 MFMER | slide-8
Clinical Assessment
Cammu G, et al. Anesth Analg. 2006 Feb;102(2):426-9.
©2014 MFMER | slide-9
©2014 MFMER | slide-10
Peripheral Nerve Stimulator
Cannot reliably detect fade when TOFR > 0.4
• RD Miller Anesthesiology 1985
• SJ Brull A&A 1993
• Capron A&A 2006
©2014 MFMER | slide-11
Trouble counting twitches
• 50 patients, 666 neurostimulations
• Overestimated twitch count 47%
of the time
• Subjective evaluations were
higher than objective 92% of the
time
(95% CI, 87 to 95; P <
0.001)
Renew JR, et al. Can J Anaesth. 2023 May;70(5):878-885.
©2014 MFMER | slide-12
©2014 MFMER | slide-13
The Ideal Monitor
• Easy to setup/intuitive
• Cost effective
• Portable
• Integrates into EMR
• Adds value during all phases of
perioperative care
• Works in a variety of settings (ICU)
©2014 MFMER | slide-14
Mechanomyography
• Historic gold standard
• Measures force of isometric
contractions
• Force is converted to electrical
signal
Brull SJ, Murphy GS. Anesth Analg 111; 129-40, 2010
.
©2014 MFMER | slide-15
Acceleromyography (AMG)
• Most frequently studied
• Measures acceleration (requires freely
moving thumb)
• Can use ECG leads
• “Reverse fade”- baseline TOFR > 100%
• “Staircase phenomenon” – repetitive
stimulation increases amplitude of
muscle contraction (ST stimulation)
©2014 MFMER | slide-16
AMG
• 3D transducers can measure complex movement of thumb
• First modality to incorporate Bluetooth connectivity
• Recent efforts demonstrated good level of agreements
• Calibration, normalization, and preload application improved
agreement
Murphy GS, et al. Anesthesiology. 2018 Nov;129(5):880-888.
©2014 MFMER | slide-17
©2014 MFMER | slide-18
© 2021
AMERICAN
SOCIETY
OF
ANESTHES
IOLOGIST
18
Can I still tuck the
arms?
©2014 MFMER | slide-19
© 2021
AMERICAN
SOCIETY
OF
ANESTHES
IOLOGIST
19
Do I have to calibrate?
©2014 MFMER | slide-20
© 2021
AMERICAN
SOCIETY
OF
ANESTHES
IOLOGIST
20
What about
normalization?
©2014 MFMER | slide-21
@ Extubation 90%
@ Baseline 119%
≈74%
119% X 0.9 ≈108%
©2014 MFMER | slide-22
Normalization Matters
• Bias between AMG devices is less with normalization
• Bias between AMG and EMG is less with normalization
• POPULAR study
• Utilized mostly uncalibrated, non-normalized AMG
• Post hoc analysis demonstrated raising threshold for
recovery to TOFR > 0.95 did reduce PPC
© 2021
AMERICAN
SOCIETY
OF
ANESTHES
IOLOGIST
22
Murphy GS, et al. Anesthesiology. 2018 Nov;129(5):880-888.
Nemes R, et al. Anesthesiology 2021 Oct 1;135(4):597-611.
Kirmeier E, et al. Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Feb;7(2):129-140.
Blobner M, et al. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jan;124(1):63-72.
©2014 MFMER | slide-23
Kinemyography (KMG)
• Similar to AMG
• Measures degree of bend of
piezoelectric sensor
• Large bias and wide limits of
agreement
• Not associated with reverse
fade
Khandkar C,et al. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2016;44:745–751.
Motamed C, et al. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003;20:467–469.
©2014 MFMER | slide-24
Electromyography (EMG)
• Measures action potentials (electrical
activity) of muscle after neurostimulation
• Does not require freely moving limbs
• Consistent responses over time and not
susceptible to changes in myofibril
contractility like AMG
• Results comparable to MMG
Hemmerling TM. Can J Anesth 54;58-72, 2007.
©2014 MFMER | slide-25
Modified Cuff Technique
• Integrated into BP cuff
• Stimulates brachial plexus and integrated sensors quantifies pressure changes of the cuff
©2014 MFMER | slide-26
Monitoring Sites
• Diaphragm
• Hand (AP, ADM, FDI)
• Face (CS, OO)
• Foot (FHB)
©2014 MFMER | slide-27
The Diaphragm
Sheiner LB, et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1979 Mar;25(3):358-71
Plasma
Diaphragm
Adductor pollicis
Diaphragm Adductor pollicis
Diaphragm
Adductor
pollicis
©2014 MFMER | slide-28
©2014 MFMER | slide-29
The Hand
Renew JR, et al. Anesth Analg. 2021 May 1;132(5):1421-1428.
Bowdle A, et al. Anaesthesia. 2020 Feb;75(2):187-195
©2014 MFMER | slide-30
Patterns of Neurostimulation
• Single Twitch
• Train-of-four
• Double burst stimulation
• Post-tetanic count
©2014 MFMER | slide-31
Train of Four
Naguib M, et al. Anaesthesia. 2017 Jan;72 Suppl 1:16-37
©2014 MFMER | slide-32
Post-Tetanic Count
Naguib M, Brull SJ, Johnson KB. 2017 Jan;72 Suppl 1:16-37.
Dhonneur G, et al. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Sep;99(3):376-9.
©2014 MFMER | slide-33
©2014 MFMER | slide-34
• SGX without monitoring resulted in up to 9.4% of patients with
residual weakness after extubation
• “We found that reversal with sugammadex failed to eliminate the
occurrence of postoperative residual weakness”
Kotake Y, et al. Anesth Analg. 2013 Aug;117(2):345-51.
NMBA Antagonism
Monitoring
Optimal NMB Management
©2014 MFMER | slide-35
Your Practice
© 2021
AMERICAN
SOCIETY
OF
ANESTHES
IOLOGIST
35
©2014 MFMER | slide-36
Introducing monitoring into practice
Todd MM, et al. Anesth Analg. 2014 Aug;119(2):323-331.
Weigel WA, et al. Anesthesiology. 2022 Jun 1;136(6):901-915
©2014 MFMER | slide-37
Path to success
• Local champions
• EMR Integration
• Demonstrate value
• Accountability
• Continued education
• Picking the right monitor(s)
©2014 MFMER | slide-39
Impact on Sugammadex Usage
• 87% required less than the manufacturer recommendations
• 13% required more
Bowdle TA, et al. Anesthesiology. 2023 Jul 1;139(1):6-15.
©2014 MFMER | slide-40
Take home points
• Monitoring + reversal = best practice
• Place the monitor pre-induction
• Normalize AMG, try to keep thumb free
• EMG for tucked arms
• PTC for deep blockade
• Muscle groups respond differently to NMB
• Changing the practice is work but monitoring can add value
©2014 MFMER | slide-41
Questions?
@rossrenew
Renew.j@mayo.edu