©2014 MFMER | slide-1
J. Ross Renew MD FASA FASE
Associate Professor of Anesthesiology
Vice Chair of Research
Mayo Clinic Florida
@rossrenew
HOW TO IMPLEMENT QUANTITATIVE
NEUROMUSCULAR MONITORING
INTO YOUR PRACTICE
©2014 MFMER | slide-2
Merck-funded research (funds to Mayo Clinic)
Speaker for Senzime AB
Disclosures
©2014 MFMER | slide-3
To Do…
Why should I care about monitoring?
Recent advances in objective neuromuscular monitoring modalities
Anesthesia 101: Monitoring Sites/ Patterns of Neurostimulation
Practical considerations for introducing objective neuromuscular
monitors into practice
©2014 MFMER | slide-4
Consequences of Residual NMB
Subjectively worse recovery
Murphy Anesthesiology 2011, Murphy A&A 2013, Murphy A&A 2021
Hypoxemia
Murphy A&A 2008
Impaired Pulmonary Function
Eikermann Chest 2005
Upper airway obstruction
Sundman Anesthesiology 2000, Murphy A&A 2008
Postop pneumonia
Berg Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1997
Respiratory failure
McLean Anesthesiology 2015
https://www.istockphoto.com/photo/large-stack-of-papers-gm184881173-18349926
©2014 MFMER | slide-5
Nomenclature
Clinical assessment = 5 sec head lift, grip strength, etc…
Subjective evaluation = Peripheral nerve stimulator (PNS)
Quantitative (objective) monitoring = monitor that
stimulates a peripheral nerve, measures the response to
stimulation, and converts this signal to objective data
©2014 MFMER | slide-6
©2014 MFMER | slide-7
©2014 MFMER | slide-8
Clinical Assessment
Cammu G, et al. Anesth Analg. 2006 Feb;102(2):426-9.
©2014 MFMER | slide-9
©2014 MFMER | slide-10
Peripheral Nerve Stimulator
Cannot reliably detect fade when TOFR > 0.4
RD Miller Anesthesiology 1985
SJ Brull A&A 1993
Capron A&A 2006
©2014 MFMER | slide-11
Trouble counting twitches
50 patients, 666 neurostimulations
Overestimated twitch count 47%
of the time
Subjective evaluations were
higher than objective 92% of the
time
(95% CI, 87 to 95; P <
0.001)
Renew JR, et al. Can J Anaesth. 2023 May;70(5):878-885.
©2014 MFMER | slide-12
©2014 MFMER | slide-13
The Ideal Monitor
Easy to setup/intuitive
Cost effective
Portable
Integrates into EMR
Adds value during all phases of
perioperative care
Works in a variety of settings (ICU)
©2014 MFMER | slide-14
Mechanomyography
Historic gold standard
Measures force of isometric
contractions
Force is converted to electrical
signal
Brull SJ, Murphy GS. Anesth Analg 111; 129-40, 2010
.
©2014 MFMER | slide-15
Acceleromyography (AMG)
Most frequently studied
Measures acceleration (requires freely
moving thumb)
Can use ECG leads
“Reverse fade”- baseline TOFR > 100%
“Staircase phenomenon” repetitive
stimulation increases amplitude of
muscle contraction (ST stimulation)
©2014 MFMER | slide-16
AMG
3D transducers can measure complex movement of thumb
First modality to incorporate Bluetooth connectivity
Recent efforts demonstrated good level of agreements
Calibration, normalization, and preload application improved
agreement
Murphy GS, et al. Anesthesiology. 2018 Nov;129(5):880-888.
©2014 MFMER | slide-17
©2014 MFMER | slide-18
© 2021
AMERICAN
SOCIETY
OF
ANESTHES
IOLOGIST
18
Can I still tuck the
arms?
©2014 MFMER | slide-19
© 2021
AMERICAN
SOCIETY
OF
ANESTHES
IOLOGIST
19
Do I have to calibrate?
©2014 MFMER | slide-20
© 2021
AMERICAN
SOCIETY
OF
ANESTHES
IOLOGIST
20
What about
normalization?
©2014 MFMER | slide-21
@ Extubation 90%
@ Baseline 119%
≈74%
119% X 0.9 ≈108%
©2014 MFMER | slide-22
Normalization Matters
Bias between AMG devices is less with normalization
Bias between AMG and EMG is less with normalization
POPULAR study
Utilized mostly uncalibrated, non-normalized AMG
Post hoc analysis demonstrated raising threshold for
recovery to TOFR > 0.95 did reduce PPC
© 2021
AMERICAN
SOCIETY
OF
ANESTHES
IOLOGIST
22
Murphy GS, et al. Anesthesiology. 2018 Nov;129(5):880-888.
Nemes R, et al. Anesthesiology 2021 Oct 1;135(4):597-611.
Kirmeier E, et al. Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Feb;7(2):129-140.
Blobner M, et al. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jan;124(1):63-72.
©2014 MFMER | slide-23
Kinemyography (KMG)
Similar to AMG
Measures degree of bend of
piezoelectric sensor
Large bias and wide limits of
agreement
Not associated with reverse
fade
Khandkar C,et al. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2016;44:745751.
Motamed C, et al. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003;20:467469.
©2014 MFMER | slide-24
Electromyography (EMG)
Measures action potentials (electrical
activity) of muscle after neurostimulation
Does not require freely moving limbs
Consistent responses over time and not
susceptible to changes in myofibril
contractility like AMG
Results comparable to MMG
Hemmerling TM. Can J Anesth 54;58-72, 2007.
©2014 MFMER | slide-25
Modified Cuff Technique
Integrated into BP cuff
Stimulates brachial plexus and integrated sensors quantifies pressure changes of the cuff
©2014 MFMER | slide-26
Monitoring Sites
Diaphragm
Hand (AP, ADM, FDI)
Face (CS, OO)
Foot (FHB)
©2014 MFMER | slide-27
The Diaphragm
Sheiner LB, et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1979 Mar;25(3):358-71
Plasma
Diaphragm
Adductor pollicis
Diaphragm Adductor pollicis
Diaphragm
Adductor
pollicis
©2014 MFMER | slide-28
©2014 MFMER | slide-29
The Hand
Renew JR, et al. Anesth Analg. 2021 May 1;132(5):1421-1428.
Bowdle A, et al. Anaesthesia. 2020 Feb;75(2):187-195
©2014 MFMER | slide-30
Patterns of Neurostimulation
Single Twitch
Train-of-four
Double burst stimulation
Post-tetanic count
©2014 MFMER | slide-31
Train of Four
Naguib M, et al. Anaesthesia. 2017 Jan;72 Suppl 1:16-37
©2014 MFMER | slide-32
Post-Tetanic Count
Naguib M, Brull SJ, Johnson KB. 2017 Jan;72 Suppl 1:16-37.
Dhonneur G, et al. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Sep;99(3):376-9.
©2014 MFMER | slide-33
©2014 MFMER | slide-34
SGX without monitoring resulted in up to 9.4% of patients with
residual weakness after extubation
“We found that reversal with sugammadex failed to eliminate the
occurrence of postoperative residual weakness”
Kotake Y, et al. Anesth Analg. 2013 Aug;117(2):345-51.
NMBA Antagonism
Monitoring
Optimal NMB Management
©2014 MFMER | slide-35
Your Practice
© 2021
AMERICAN
SOCIETY
OF
ANESTHES
IOLOGIST
35
©2014 MFMER | slide-36
Introducing monitoring into practice
Todd MM, et al. Anesth Analg. 2014 Aug;119(2):323-331.
Weigel WA, et al. Anesthesiology. 2022 Jun 1;136(6):901-915
©2014 MFMER | slide-37
Path to success
Local champions
EMR Integration
Demonstrate value
Accountability
Continued education
Picking the right monitor(s)
©2014 MFMER | slide-39
Impact on Sugammadex Usage
87% required less than the manufacturer recommendations
13% required more
Bowdle TA, et al. Anesthesiology. 2023 Jul 1;139(1):6-15.
©2014 MFMER | slide-40
Take home points
Monitoring + reversal = best practice
Place the monitor pre-induction
Normalize AMG, try to keep thumb free
EMG for tucked arms
PTC for deep blockade
Muscle groups respond differently to NMB
Changing the practice is work but monitoring can add value
©2014 MFMER | slide-41
Questions?
@rossrenew
Renew.j@mayo.edu