MPOG as a Platform for Education
Alex Macario MD, MBA
Professor and Vice-chair of education
Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine
Stanford University
Secretary, American Board of Anesthesiology
• MPOG is already an education platform
• Review the five elements of education and who
the potential learners are
• MPOG may help us measure clinical experience
to allow for precision education
• ACGME quality metrics requirement
• MPOG and ABA continuing certification
Take home points:
We may think of our missions in academic
medicine as separate
Patient care
Education
Research
Patient care
Education
Research
In fact all three missions are intertwined:
the better the clinical care and the better the research the
better the education
By promoting safe and evidence-based
perioperative patient care, and by
performing research, MPOG is already a
platform for education
A framework: five elements of education
and who the potential learners are
• Administration/leadership
• Curriculum
• Teaching
• Assessment
• Advising/mentoring
The five education elements
Potential learners
• The community (lay people)
• Undergraduates
• Medical students
• Graduate Medical Education
• Residents
• Fellows
• Anesthesiologists with lifelong learning
• CME
• Board Certification
• Administration/leadership
-- (an MPOG education coordinating arm)
• Curriculum
-- MPOG CME programs
• Teaching
-- (MPOG develops innovative augmented reality modules to
improve adherence to quality metrics)
• Assessment
-- ASPIRE metrics
• Advising/mentoring
-- (MPOG consult or coaching service)
With this framework what could MPOG do?
MPOG may help us measure clinical
experience to allow for precision education
MPOG to better capture resident and fellow
clinical activity and variability
(Matt Caldwell @ Michigan is doing this)
the specialty is broad and deep so every day a
trainee has in training needs to be maximized to
be high yield
Case numbers for Resident
ACGME Minimum Required
% above
Patients < 3 months old 5
240%
Patients < 3 years old 20
316%
Patients < 12 years old 100
150%
Spinals 40
251%
Epidurals 40
422%
Peripheral Nerve Blocks 40
276%
Trauma/Burns 20
199%
Total Cardiac 20
275%
Intrathoracic Non-Cardiac 20
162%
Vascular, Major Vessels 20
174%
Vaginal Delivery 40
235%
Cesarean (including high risk) 20
269%
Pain Evaluation - acute, chronic, cancer 20
291%
Intracerebral Open 11
414%
Total Intracerebral (with endovascular) 20
200%
Using MPOG for automated data reports would
address barriers to self reporting including:
(1) once a resident reaches the minimum requirements for
case, they may be less motivated to log more,
(2) lack of accepted guidelines (so need to standardize
definitions) for logging cases (e.g., some residents record
cases when a resident relieves another resident, but not all
residents do this)
What about using MPOG to measure
experience with non-ACGME case types or
other operating room events?
Examples
• CPR in OR
• Massive transfusion (Matt Caldwell@Michigan)
• Delayed emergence
• LAST
• Many others TBD (analogous to how ASPIRE
metrics have been identified as important and
defined)
MPOG: can it facilitate precision education?
Individualize training
difficult to know ahead of time which cases
will have adverse events to assign resident
there
but can learn in other ways (participate in
debrief of case)
Imagine a dynamic portfolio or dashboard of
completed experiences and needed elements
Linked to
Competency based education
Since we don’t really know what the clinical
education for any one resident is exactly….
What about AI and MPOG
?
Future studies will have titles like:
• Use of machine learning models to predict which
training experiences residents have are associated
with better clinical outcomes
• AI based prediction of competence for residents once
they enter autonomous practice
computational
power
MPOG curated dataset
ACGME quality metrics requirement
ACGME Program Requirements for
Graduate Medical Education in Anesthesiology
• If practice model is to supervise residents and
CRNAs (multiple providers) how does one best
change practice to improve the metrics?
• Does showing practitioners their own quality
metrics improve future performance and clinical
outcomes?
Questions that come to mind
MPOG and ABA continuing certification:
a future with seamless integration?
Professional
Standing and
Conduct
Lifelong
Learning
Improving Health
and Health Care
Medical License
active, unrestricted
MOCA Minute
Answer 120 questions each year,
meet the performance standard
CME
125 Category 1 CME credits
every five years (including for
participation in MPOG)
Quality Improvement
Earn and attest
25 QI points every
five years
2024: American Board of Medical Specialties Standards for
Continuing Certification
IMPROVING HEALTH AND HEALTHCARE
Requirements
Standard # 18. Quality Agenda
In collaboration with stakeholder organizations, Member
Boards must facilitate the process for developing an
agenda for improving the quality of care in their
specialties.
Standard #19. Engagement in Improving Health & Health Care
Member Board continuing certification programs must commit to helping
the medical profession improve health and health care by:
• Setting goals and meeting progressive participation metrics that
demonstrate an ever-increasing commitment towards having all
diplomates engaged in activities that improve care
Standard #19. Engagement in Improving Health & Health Care
• Working with partner organizations, including medical specialty
societies, to create systems (e.g., data transfer process), for
diplomates engaged in the organizations’ quality improvement
activities to seamlessly receive credit from the Member Boards
• Modeling continuous quality improvement by evaluating methods and
sharing best practices for program implementation and diplomate
engagement.
• Recognizing the quality improvement expertise of partner
organizations and seeking collaborative opportunities for diplomate
engagement with efforts to improve care through a variety of existing
efforts
The ABA has a new Continuing Certification Committee that
is working to improve the QI piece of continuing certification
Committee Membership
4 ABA director members
6 non-director members (5 are from community practice)
1 ASA representative
Thank you!
Breakout Group Discussion Questions
1. Where will the resources and funding for education initiatives
using the MPOG platform come from?
2. Does creating a formal education arm of MPOG advance the
mission?
-
governance, strategic planning, multi-institution
3. What are competitor platforms to MPOG to delivering on the
promise?
-
ease of use, cost
Q and A: Questions to think about